- 3 - petitioner reported a substantial net loss from his mining activity. Following an examination of petitioner’s tax returns for the years at issue, respondent issued notices of deficiency in which respondent proposed noncomputational adjustments2 to petitioner’s tax returns as follows: (a) Respondent disallowed all of petitioner’s mining expense deductions for each of the years 1991, 1992, 1993, and 1994; (b) respondent disallowed part of petitioner’s alimony deductions for 1991 and 1992; (c) respondent determined that petitioner received a capital gain of $23,380 from the disposition of stock of Zila, Pharmaceutical, Inc. (Zila), for 1992; (d) respondent determined that petitioner had unreported income of $667,856 from the sale of Zila stock options and the disallowance of a net operating loss for 1993; (e) respondent determined that petitioner had additional royalty income of $3,726 from Zila for 1992; and (f) respondent determined that petitioner was liable for additions to tax and penalties under sections 6651(a)(1), 6654, and 6662(a) for each of the years at issue. Respondent disallowed petitioner’s mining expense deductions on the grounds that petitioner had failed to show that his mining 2Respondent also proposed several computational adjustments.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011