- 10 - Section 1.183-2(b), Income Tax Regs., sets forth a nonexhaustive list of factors that courts often consider in deciding whether a profit objective exists. No single factor and not even a majority of the factors is controlling. Id. Rather, the factors are evaluated in order to arrive at an informed conclusion based on all the evidence regarding whether the requisite profit objective existed. Golanty v. Commissioner, supra. We considered the factors set forth in section 1.183-2(b), Income Tax Regs., and concluded that some factors favored respondent and some factors favored petitioner. One of the factors that favored respondent was petitioner’s history of income or loss. Petitioner had engaged in his mining activity since at least 1980 and had claimed substantial net operating losses with respect to his mining activity in every year from 1989 through and including the years at issue. A record of substantial losses over many years is an important factor bearing on a taxpayer’s true intent. Golanty v. Commissioner, supra at 426. We also found that petitioner failed to prove that he maintained accurate and businesslike records, a fact that is relevant in determining whether the manner in which petitioner conducted his activity is consistent with an intent to make a profit.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011