Martin H. Tonn and Lorraine A. Tonn - Page 12




                                       - 12 -                                         
          is limited to situations where the taxpayer has a basis in the              
          item he is claiming a deduction or a loss on.  See Oates v.                 
          Commissioner, 316 F.2d 56, 57-58 (8th Cir. 1963), affg. T.C.                
          Memo. 1962-77; Perry v. Commissioner, 92 T.C. 470, 477-478                  
          (1989), affd. without published opinion 912 F.2d 1466 (5th Cir.             
          1990); Swenson v. Commissioner, 43 T.C. 897, 898 (1965); Towers             
          v. Commissioner, 24 T.C. 199, 239 (1955), affd. 247 F.2d 233 (2d            
          Cir. 1957); O’Meara v. Commissioner, 8 T.C. 622, 632-633 (1947).            
          It is well established that a cash basis taxpayer is not entitled           
          to a deduction under section 165 for the loss of potential,                 
          unreported income.  See Hort v. Commissioner, 313 U.S. 28, 33               
          (1941); Escofil v. Commissioner, 464 F.2d 358, 359 (3d Cir.                 
          1972), affg. T.C. Memo. 1971-131; Hutcheson v. Commissioner, 17             
          T.C. 14, 19 (1951).  Additionally, a cash basis taxpayer is not             
          entitled to a deduction under section 166 for an income item when           
          the item has never been reported in income.  See Gertz v.                   
          Commissioner, 64 T.C. 598, 600 (1975); Seymour v. Commissioner,             
          14 T.C. 1111, 1117 (1950); Garrison v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo.             
          1994-200, affd. without published opinion 67 F.3d 299 (6th Cir.             
          1995).  “A short form for stating the rule might thus be that the           
          process of establishing a basis for an income item consists, in             
          effect, of reporting it in the taxpayer’s gross income for tax              
          purposes.”  O’Meara v. Commissioner, supra at 633.                          
               Petitioners do not dispute respondent’s specific allegation            






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011