Estate of H.A. True, Jr. - Page 51




                                       - 137 -                                        
               Moreover, the True family sometimes chose not to use tax               
          book value pricing formulas in their dealings with unrelated                
          parties.  Petitioners highlight the fact that unrelated                     
          stockholders sold their stock in Belle Fourche to Dave and Jean             
          True (not pursuant to buy-sell agreements) at a book value price.           
          However, we note that one unrelated shareholder sold stock, which           
          amounted to 24 percent of the stock initially issued by the                 
          corporation, for more than book value; in addition, the book                
          value used in buying out unrelated shareholders of Belle Fourche            
          was GAAP book value rather than tax book value.  See supra p. 23.           
          Also, the White Stallion buy-sell agreement, which included                 
          parties that would not be considered natural objects of Dave                
          True’s bounty (Dave True’s brother and his family), was the only            
          buy-sell agreement that departed from a pure tax book value                 
          pricing formula (see “First Right of Refusal” provision described           
          supra p. 49).  Similarly, the Toolpushers Employees’ Trust was              
          specifically exempted from Toolpushers’ buy-sell agreement, thus            
          allowing the Employees’ Trust to sell its shares back to the                
          company for more than book value.  In an analogous situation, the           
          True Oil employee profit-sharing plan’s contribution formula                
          required intangible drilling costs (IDC’s), which were deducted             
          for tax book purposes, to be added back to determine annual                 
          profits for the purpose of determining the employer’s                       
          contribution obligations.                                                   







Page:  Previous  127  128  129  130  131  132  133  134  135  136  137  138  139  140  141  142  143  144  145  146  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011