UAL Corporation and Subsidiaries - Page 40




                                        - 40 -                                        
          travel expenses, it could have so provided.  Congress not having            
          done so, it appears to me inappropriate for us to do so.                    

          $44 or $14 Per Diem Limitation on Overnight Per Diem Allowances             
               With regard to the section 274(d) substantiation                       
          requirements applicable to United’s overnight per diem                      
          allowances, respondent’s regulations and rulings are to be given            
          particular weight.  See sec. 274(d); sec. 1.274-5(c)(2)(b),                 
          Income Tax Regs.  The majority opinion, however, ignores the                
          specific rulings that respondent promulgated which apply to                 
          employer-provided overnight travel allowances and to the years in           
          controversy herein.                                                         
               Rev. Rul. 80-62, 1980-1 C.B. 63 (hereinafter referred to as            
          the $44 Ruling), provided that, for overnight travel allowances,            
          the maximum per diem deduction available without substantiation             
          was $44 per day, which included travel expenses for meals and               
          lodging, laundry, cleaning and pressing of clothing, and fees and           
          tips for services, such as for waiters and baggage handlers.                
               However, Rev. Rul. 84-164, 1984-2 C.B. 63 (hereinafter                 
          referred to as the $14 Ruling), provided that the $44 Ruling did            
          not apply where the “per diem allowances [were] intended to cover           
          only employee meal expenses, as when the employer pays for                  
          directly or furnishes the lodging, or when there is no lodging              
          expense.”  (Emphasis added.)  The $14 Ruling's stated purpose is            
          to amplify and to limit the $44 Ruling.                                     





Page:  Previous  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011