- 4 - first 3 digits of which were as follows: Name Relationship SSN Benjamin Vega father 551-xx-xxxx Margarita Campos mother 455-xx-xxxx Jose De Jesus Vega brother 570-xx-xxxx Rafael Vega brother 548-xx-xxxx Cleofas Gabriela Vega sister 573-xx-xxxx Liliana Margarita Vega sister 573-xx-xxxx Petitioner also timely filed a U.S. Individual Income Tax Return (Form 1040) for 1997. On his return, petitioner designated his filing status as head of household and claimed the standard deduction in the amount appropriate to that filing status. Also on his return, petitioner claimed his relatives (except for Jose De Jesus Vega) as dependents. For each of his relatives, petitioner listed a purported 9-digit SSN, the first 3 digits of which were as follows: Name Relationship SSN Benjamin Vega father 551-xx-xxxx Margarita Campos mother 455-xx-xxxx Rafael Vega brother 1456-xx-xxxx Cleofas Gabriela Vega sister 573-xx-xxxx Liliana Margarita Vega sister 573-xx-xxxx 1 Eight of the 9 digits of the purported SSN for Rafael Vega on the 1997 return were different from the purported SSN for Rafael Vega on the 1996 return. This discrepancy is unexplained in the record. According to the Office of the Regional Commissioner of the Social Security Administration in Richmond, California, each of the seven different purported SSNs listed by petitioner on his 1996 and 1997 tax returns for his relatives is a validly assigned Social Security number, but it belongs to someone other thanPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011