- 10 - We are unable to accept petitioner’s testimony for a variety of reasons, among them the following three: First, petitioner introduced no documentary evidence to support his testimony.7 Second, we do not think that a U.S. consular office would issue six SSNs that had already been assigned to other individuals. Third, we do not think that SSNs would be assigned to nonresident foreign nationals who are not employed in the United States or not otherwise legally in the United States for a valid nonwork purpose. In this regard, see 20 C.F.R. sec. 422.104(a)(2), (3), 422.107(a), (e) (2000). In view of the foregoing, we hold that section 151(e) bars allowance of deductions for dependency exemptions for petitioner’s relatives on petitioner’s 1996 and 1997 income tax returns. Respondent’s determination in this regard is therefore sustained. Issue (2): Filing Status Petitioner designated his filing status as head of household on his 1996 and 1997 income tax returns. As relevant herein, a taxpayer is considered a head of household if either (1) the taxpayer maintains as his or her home a household that constitutes, for more than one-half of the 7 Petitioner did offer one exhibit in support of his testimony, but it was not admitted into evidence because (inter alia) it was incomplete on its face, it was not authenticated, and it was hearsay (and there were no circumstantial guaranties of trustworthiness or other applicable hearsay exception).Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011