Veterinary Surgical Consultants, P.C. - Page 13




                                       - 13 -                                         
          “who provide services to an S corporation can be treated like               
          employees and covered by that corporation’s retirement plan.”               
          Durando v. United States, supra at 551.  In sum, the Durando case           
          does not provide a reasonable basis for not treating Dr. Sadanaga           
          as an employee.                                                             
               Petitioner also relies on Rev. Rul. 59-221, 1959-1 C.B. 225.           
          Rev. Rul. 59-221, supra, holds that where a small business                  
          corporation elects under section 1372 not to be subject to Federal          
          income tax, the amount of its income required to be included in             
          each shareholder’s gross income does not constitute “net earnings           
          from self-employment” to such shareholders for purposes of the              
          Self-Employment Contributions Act.  That ruling, like the Durando           
          case, deals solely with whether amounts a shareholder receives are          
          derived from a trade or business carried on by the shareholder.  In         
          the case at hand, the issue is whether an officer is an employee of         
          a corporation.  Rev. Rul. 59-221, supra, makes no mention of either         
          corporate officers or their Federal employment tax status.                  
          Therefore, the ruling does not provide a reasonable basis for               
          treating Dr. Sadanaga other than as an employee.                            
               Petitioner attempts to distinguish the facts in this case from         
          cases holding that officers who performed substantial services for          
          an S corporation are employees for purposes of Federal employment           
          taxes.  In Spicer Accounting, Inc. v. United States, 918 F.2d 90            
          (9th Cir. 1990), and Radtke v. United States, 895 F.2d 1196 (7th            






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011