- 11 - 6662(a) of the Code. Weir should not be liable for these penalties, since she had reasonable cause for relying on the language of the Separation Agreement showing that her ex-husband was awarded all interest in the military retirement benefits and she merely received settlement payments from him and that it was not due to willful neglect. C. Burden of Proof There is some question here as to who bears the burden of proof with respect to the additions to tax and penalty. Section 7491(c) provides: “Notwithstanding any other provision of this title, the Secretary shall have the burden of production in any court proceeding with respect to the liability of any individual for any penalty, addition to tax, or additional amount imposed by this title.” The burden imposed by section 7491(c) is only to come forward with evidence regarding the appropriateness of applying a particular addition to tax or penalty to the taxpayer. Respondent need not negate all defenses to the additions or penalties. See Higbee v. Commissioner, 116 T.C. , (2001). Section 7491 is effective for court proceedings arising in connection with examinations commencing after July 22, 1998. See Internal Revenue Service Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998, Pub. L. 105-206, sec. 3001, 112 Stat. 726. The notice is dated January 22, 1999. The parties have not informed us whether the examination commenced on or before July 22, 1998. Respondent assumes that petitioner bears the burden of proof, and petitioner does not address the issue. Whether section 7491(c) applies orPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011