- 2 - Petitioner concedes that he is liable for an addition to tax of $5,001 pursuant to section 6659 for an underpayment of tax attributable to valuation overstatement. The remaining issue for decision is whether petitioner is liable for additions to tax pursuant to section 6653(a)(1) and (2) for negligence or intentional disregard of rules or regulations. Background The stipulation of facts and the accompanying exhibits are incorporated herein by reference. Petitioner resided in New York, New York, at the time his petition was filed with the Court. This case is part of the Plastics Recycling group of cases. The additions to tax arise from the disallowance of losses, investment credits, and energy credits claimed by petitioner with respect to a partnership known as Foam Recycling Associates (Foam or the partnership). For a detailed discussion of the transactions involved in the Plastics Recycling group of cases, see Provizer v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1992-177, affd. per curiam without published opinion 996 F.2d 1216 (6th Cir. 1993). The parties have stipulated that the underlying transactions in petitioner’s 1(...continued) Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011