Herbert L. Whitehead and Jennifer L. Whitehead - Page 58




                                       - 58 -                                         
          Accuracy-Related Penalty Under Section 6662(a)                              
               Respondent determined that petitioners are liable for each             
          year at issue for the accuracy-related penalty under section                
          6662(a) because of:  (1) A substantial understatement of income             
          tax under section 6662(b)(2) and (2) alternatively, negligence              
          under section 6662(b)(1).                                                   
               Section 6662(a) imposes an accuracy-related penalty equal to           
          20 percent of the underpayment of tax resulting from, inter alia,           
          a substantial understatement of income tax, sec. 6662(b)(2), or             
          negligence or disregard of rules or regulations, sec. 6662(b)(1).           
          For purposes of section 6662(a), an understatement is equal to              
          the excess of the amount of tax required to be shown in the tax             
          return over the amount of tax shown in the tax return, sec.                 
          6662(d)(2)(A), and is substantial in the case of an individual if           
          it exceeds the greater of 10 percent of the tax required to be              
          shown or $5,000, sec. 6662(d)(1)(A).  For purposes of section               
          6662(a), the term “negligence” includes any failure to make a               
          reasonable attempt to comply with the Code, and the term “disre-            
          gard” includes any careless, reckless, or intentional disregard.            
          Sec. 6662(c).  Negligence has also been defined as a lack of due            
          care or failure to do what a reasonable person would do under the           
          circumstances.  Leuhsler v. Commissioner, 963 F.2d 907, 910 (6th            
          Cir. 1992), affg. T.C. Memo. 1991-179; Antonides v. Commissioner,           
          91 T.C. 686, 699 (1988), affd. 893 F.2d 656 (4th Cir. 1990).                






Page:  Previous  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  51  52  53  54  55  56  57  58  59  60  61  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011