Herbert L. Whitehead and Jennifer L. Whitehead - Page 45




                                       - 45 -                                         
          disputes with respect to Ms. Whitehead’s use of certain Burien              
          Nissan automobiles during the years at issue are whether:                   
          (1) Ms. Whitehead performed services for Burien Nissan during the           
          years at issue for which she was compensated by her personal use            
          of certain Burien Nissan automobiles during those years; (2) in             
          the performance of such services, Ms. Whitehead worked at least             
          120 hours during each year at issue; and (3) for 1996, petition-            
          ers correctly reported the value of Ms. Whitehead’s services in             
          their joint return for that year as self-employment income in the           
          amount of $6,600.37                                                         

               36(...continued)                                                       
          lished through their testimony at trial that, at least during               
          1996, Ms. Whitehead “used her vehicle for business purposes and             
          no adjustment was made for such use or for fuel purchased by                
          petitioner[s] from personal funds.”  However, petitioners indi-             
          cate on brief that they will adhere to the “conservative ap-                
          proach” that they claim they took in their joint return for each            
          of the years at issue, in which they reported income from their             
          respective claimed personal uses of certain Burien Nissan automo-           
          biles during those years.  That “conservative approach” was based           
          on the alleged business use of certain Burien Nissan automobiles            
          by Mr. Whitehead only, and not by Ms. Whitehead.                            
               Assuming arguendo that petitioners had not adhered to the              
          “conservative approach” that they claim they took in their joint            
          return for each of the years at issue and that petitioners are              
          contending that any portion of Ms. Whitehead’s use of certain               
          Burien Nissan automobiles during the years at issue constituted a           
          business use of such automobiles, on the record before us, we               
          find that petitioners have failed to show that any portion of her           
          use of such automobiles during those years constituted a business           
          use of such automobiles.                                                    
               37Petitioners allege as facts that, for each year at issue,            
          Ms. Whitehead performed services for Burien Nissan, she was                 
          compensated for such services through her personal use of certain           
                                                             (continued...)           





Page:  Previous  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  51  52  53  54  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011