Herbert L. Whitehead and Jennifer L. Whitehead - Page 40




                                       - 40 -                                         
          portion of a taxable year.  Sec. 1.274-5T(c)(3)(ii)(B), Temporary           
          Income Tax Regs., 50 Fed. Reg. 46021 (Nov. 6, 1985).                        
               Having set forth the pertinent law, we turn to whether,                
          without regard to the requirements of section 274(d) and the                
          regulations thereunder, petitioners have shown that any payment             
          by them for Mr. Whitehead’s use of certain Burien Nissan automo-            
          biles during the years at issue would be allowable as a deduction           
          under section 162 or section 167.  Petitioners make no arguments            
          or contentions with respect to that question.  On the record                
          before us, we find that petitioners have failed to show that,               
          without regard to the requirements of section 274(d) and the                
          regulations thereunder, any such payment would be allowable as a            
          deduction under either of those sections.                                   
               Assuming arguendo that petitioners had shown that, without             
          regard to section 274(d) and the regulations thereunder, any                
          payment by them for Mr. Whitehead’s use of certain Burien Nissan            
          automobiles during the years at issue would be allowable as a               
          deduction under section 162 or section 167, see sec. 132(d),                
          petitioners must nonetheless establish that they have satisfied             
          the substantiation requirements of section 274(d) and the regula-           
          tions thereunder.  Petitioners have attempted to meet those                 
          substantiation requirements through the sampling method of                  
          substantiation.  On the record before us, we find that petition-            
          ers have failed to show that they are entitled to use the sam-              






Page:  Previous  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011