Elliot Virgil Wilkerson - Page 3




                                        - 2 -                                         

               Respondent determined deficiencies of $714 and $8,804 in               
          petitioner's Federal income taxes for 1997 and 1998,                        
          respectively.                                                               
               The sole issue for decision is whether, by virtue of an                
          agreement between petitioner's employer and the labor union of              
          which petitioner was a member, the compensation paid to                     
          petitioner for the 2 years at issue is excludable from income               
          under section 61(a).                                                        
               Some of the facts were stipulated.  Those facts and the                
          accompanying exhibits are so found and are incorporated herein by           
          reference.  Petitioner's legal residence at the time the                    
          petitions were filed was Dothan, Alabama.                                   
               During the years at issue, petitioner was an equipment                 
          operator for Great Northern Nekoosa Corp., a subsidiary of                  
          Georgia Pacific Corp. (the company) at a wood-chipping mill known           
          as the Cedar Springs operation.  Petitioner began his work with             
          the company in 1978.  He was a member of Local 1703 of the United           
          Paperworkers International Union, AFL-CIO (the union).  There was           
          a collective bargaining agreement between the company and the               
          union.                                                                      
               Sometime prior to the years at issue, the company made plans           
          to construct a new mill at Cedar Springs and considered having              
          the new mill operated by contract employees who would not be                
          members of the union.  As expected, the union vehemently opposed            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011