Elliot Virgil Wilkerson - Page 5




                                        - 4 -                                         

               Petitioner's 1997 amended return was not processed by the              
          Internal Revenue Service as a return but was instead treated as a           
          claim for refund, which was disallowed.                                     
               In the notice of deficiency for 1998, respondent determined            
          that the $60,461 petitioner earned from the company during 1998             
          constituted salary or wage income.  In the notice of deficiency             
          for 1997, respondent determined that petitioner failed to include           
          in income a State income tax refund of $2,540 petitioner received           
          that year.                                                                  
               Petitioner conceded the State income tax refund for 1997 but           
          contends he made an overpayment of taxes for 1997 because of his            
          inclusion of the wages he received from the company that year.              
          For 1998, petitioner contends the wages he received that year               
          from the company are not includable in gross income.                        
               Petitioner contends that, because he and the other employees           
          of the company forfeited certain rights they otherwise possessed            
          as employees under the collective bargaining agreement, they were           
          reduced to what he referred to as "nonentities", and, as such,              
          their income is not taxable.  Petitioner argues that he and his             
          fellow employees were reduced to a status "less than all other              
          taxpayers" and, therefore, should not be liable for Federal                 
          income taxes.                                                               
               Petitioner cited no authority for his position, and, indeed,           
          there is no such authority to support his position.                         





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011