- 13 - manner in which the taxpayer carries on the activity; (2) the expertise of the taxpayer or his or her advisers; (3) the time and effort the taxpayer expended in carrying on the activity; (4) the expectation that assets used in the activity may appreciate in value; (5) the taxpayer’s success in carrying on other activities; (6) the taxpayer’s history of income or loss with respect to the activity; (7) the amount of occasional profits, if any, which are earned; (8) the taxpayer’s financial status; and (9) whether elements of personal pleasure or recreation are involved. Sec. 1.183-2(b), Income Tax Regs; see Golanty v. Commissioner, supra. As discussed below, on the basis of all the evidence in the record, we conclude that Tony had no good faith expectation of making a profit from the stock car activity. 1. Manner of Carrying on Activity Tony kept no regular books and records of his stock car activity. He had no business plan and made no predictions of income or expenses. He carried no insurance on his stock car. The record does not establish whether he had resources available to repair or replace the stock car. To turn a profit on his stock car activity, Tony needed substantial funds from sponsors, since a significant share of any prize winnings would go to the driver. Tony hoped to secure large sponsorships. His testimony indicates that because hePage: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011