Charles H. Addis and Cindi Addis - Page 3




                                        - 3 -                                         
               The sole issue for decision is whether petitioners may                 
          deduct their payments to NHF as charitable contributions.1  We              
          hold that they may not.                                                     
               Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the              
          Internal Revenue Code.  Rule references are to the Tax Court                
          Rules of Practice and Procedure.                                            
                                  FINDINGS OF FACT                                    
               Some of the facts have been stipulated and are so found.               
          A.   Petitioners                                                            
               Petitioners lived in Bakersfield, California, when they                
          filed their petition in this case.  Charles H. Addis (petitioner)           
          has been a farm labor contractor in the Bakersfield area for the            
          last 20 years.                                                              
          B.   Petitioners’ Family Trust and Foundation                               
               1.   The Addis Family Trust                                            
               On May 7, 1986, petitioners formed the Charles H. Addis                
          Family Trust (Addis family trust).  Petitioners are the trustors,           
          first designee trustees, and initial beneficiaries of the Addis             
          family trust.  Under the trust instrument, petitioner’s children            
          and Mrs. Addis’ parents or siblings become beneficiaries of the             
          Addis family trust upon the deaths of petitioner and Mrs. Addis.            


               1  Petitioners contend that sec. 7491(a) requires respondent           
          to bear the burden of proof on all issues in the case.  We need             
          not decide petitioners’ contention because our findings and                 
          analysis do not depend on which party bears the burden of proof.            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011