Charles H. Addis and Cindi Addis - Page 11




                                       - 11 -                                         
          B.   Definition of Consideration Under Section 1.170A-13(f)(6),             
               Income Tax Regs.                                                       
               Petitioners contend that they did not receive consideration            
          for, i.e., that they did not receive goods or services in                   
          exchange for, their $36,000 payments to NHF because NHF was not             
          required to use those payments to pay the premiums on the life              
          insurance policy.  Petitioners contend that the fact that they              
          expected NHF to invest in the life insurance policy was not                 
          consideration for purposes of section 170(f)(8).  We disagree.              
               A donee organization provides goods or services in                     
          consideration for a taxpayer’s payment if, at the time the donor            
          makes the payment to the donee organization, the taxpayer                   
          receives or expects to receive goods or services in exchange for            
          that payment.  Section 1.170A-13(f)(6), Income Tax Regs.,                   
          provides:                                                                   
                    (6) In consideration for.  A donee organization                   
               provides goods or services in consideration for a                      
               taxpayer’s payment if, at the time the taxpayer makes                  
               the payment to the donee organization, the taxpayer                    
               receives or expects to receive goods or services in                    
               exchange for that payment. * * *                                       
               Section 1.170A-13(f)(6), Income Tax Regs., is in keeping               
          with the traditional view that a charitable contribution is one             
          for which the donor has “‘no expectation of any quid pro quo’”.             
          Hernandez v. Commissioner, 490 U.S. 680, 690 (1989) (quoting S.             
          Rept. 1622, 83d Cong., 2d Sess. 196 (1954); H. Rept. 1337, 83d              
          Cong., 2d Sess. A44 (1954) (the legislative history defines a               






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011