Fred Allnutt - Page 8




                                         - 8 -                                          
          Id.  In Allnutt I, we also (1) sustained additions to tax under               
          section 6654 as determined by the Commissioner; (2) granted the               
          Commissioner’s motion for summary judgment as to fraud under                  
          section 6653(b)(1); and (3) granted the Commissioner’s motion for             
          imposition of a penalty under section 6673.  Id.  Our decision in             
          Allnutt I is final.                                                           
                                        OPINION                                         
          A.   Whether Respondent Timely Issued the Notice of Deficiency to             
               Petitioner for Tax Years 1987-90 and 1992-95                             
               1.   Contentions of the Parties                                          
               We first decide whether respondent timely issued the notice              
          of deficiency for petitioner’s tax years 1987-90 and 1992-95.                 
          Generally, the Commissioner must assess tax within 3 years after              
          the due date of a timely filed return or the filing of the                    
          return.  Sec. 6501(a).  The notice of deficiency was sent on                  
          March 6, 2000.  If petitioner filed returns for those years                   
          before March 6, 1997, the assessment of deficiencies for 1987-90              
          and 1992-95 is barred by the statute of limitations.1  Id.  If                
          petitioner’s returns were not filed before March 6, 1997, the                 
          notice of deficiency was timely issued.                                       




               1  Respondent does not contend that petitioner omitted more              
          than 25 percent of his gross income, see sec. 6501(e), that he                
          consented to an extension of the time to assess tax, or that                  
          there are any other circumstances that would lengthen the usual               
          3-year period for assessment of tax.                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011