- 18 - reconsideration of issues that could have been litigated in that case. Thus, we reject petitioner’s contention that section 6214(b) overrides res judicata. 4. Barenholtz v. United States, Springfield St. Ry. Co. v. United States, Robarts v. Commissioner, Hamilton Indus., Inc. v. Commissioner, and Budd Co. v. Commissioner Petitioner contends that, on the basis of the holdings in Barenholtz v. United States, 784 F.2d 375, 380-381 (Fed. Cir. 1986); Springfield St. Ry. Co. v. United States, 160 Ct. Cl. 111, 312 F.2d 754, 757-759 (1963); Robarts v. Commissioner, 103 T.C. 72 (1994), affd. without published opinion 56 F.3d 1390 (11th Cir. 1995); Hamilton Indus., Inc. v. Commissioner, 97 T.C. 120, 127-128 (1991); and Budd Co. v. Commissioner, 33 T.C. 813 (1960), he is not precluded by res judicata from disputing whether he may deduct net operating losses from 1981-86 in the years in issue because those cases allowed consideration of facts from closed tax years. We disagree. The courts in those cases allowed the parties to consider facts from years closed by the statute of limitations in calculating tax liabilities for the years before the court. However, those cases do not control here because they did not involve years that were litigated and barred by res judicata.Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011