Phil E. Anderson - Page 3




                                        - 2 -                                         
               Respondent determined a deficiency in petitioner’s Federal             
          income tax for the taxable year 1998 in the amount of $4,347.               
               The issues for decision by the Court are as follows:                   
               (1) Whether petitioner is entitled to deductions for                   
          dependency exemptions for his five children.  We hold that he is            
          not.                                                                        
               (2) Whether petitioner is entitled to a child tax credit and           
          additional child tax credit.  We hold that he is not.                       
               (3) Whether petitioner is entitled to head of household                
          filing status.  We hold that he is not.                                     
               (4) Whether petitioner is entitled to an earned income                 
          credit.  We hold that he is not.                                            
               An adjustment to the amount of petitioner's standard                   
          deduction is a purely mechanical matter, the resolution of which            
          is dependent on our disposition of the disputed issue regarding             
          petitioner’s filing status.                                                 
          Background                                                                  
               This case was deemed to be submitted fully stipulated, and             
          the facts stipulated are so found.2  Petitioner resided in                  


               2  Petitioner did not appear in court when this case was               
          called for trial.  In contrast, counsel for respondent appeared             
          and stated that he had been served by petitioner with a Motion to           
          Withdraw Appeal.  Counsel indicated that under these                        
          circumstances, respondent was inclined to move to dismiss the               
          case for lack of prosecution.  However, the Court, after learning           
          that petitioner had executed a stipulation of facts, intimated              
          that it would not favorably regard such a motion and proposed               
                                                             (continued...)           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011