- 2 - under section 104(a)(2);1 (2) whether fees paid to petitioner’s attorneys in accord with a contingent fee agreement are excludable from petitioner’s gross income; and (3) whether respondent’s determination violated petitioner’s Fifth Amendment rights in the form of a Government taking without due process of law or just compensation. FINDINGS OF FACT2 At all pertinent times, Sigitas J. Banaitis (petitioner) resided in Clackamas County, Oregon. From 1980 through December 30, 1987, petitioner was employed by the Portland branch of the Bank of California, N.A. (BCal), as a loan officer and vice president. As such, petitioner solicited and maintained customers, mostly businesses, to whom BCal made loans. In so doing, petitioner and BCal obtained sensitive and highly confidential information, including information contained in financial statements. Loan customers were assured by both petitioner and BCal of confidentiality through oral assurances and written contracts. In 1984, Mitsubishi Bank, Ltd. (MBL), a member of the Mitsubishi Group (MG), acquired a controlling interest in BCal. 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year in issue. 2 The parties have stipulated some of the facts. The stipulation of facts and the attached exhibits are incorporated herein by this reference.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011