- 8 - OPINION Bad Debt Deductions3 We review for an abuse of discretion respondent’s determinations under section 166(a)(2) to disallow deductions for debts claimed to be partially worthless, and respondent’s determinations in that regard will not be disturbed unless plainly arbitrary or unreasonable. Brimberry v. Commissioner, 588 F.2d 975, 977 (5th Cir. 1979), affg. T.C. Memo. 1976-209; Austin Co. v. Commissioner, 71 T.C. 955, 971 (1979) (citing Findley v. Commissioner, 25 T.C. 311, 319 (1955), affd. per curiam 236 F.2d 959 (3d Cir. 1956)). Generally, to be entitled to deductions under section 166(a)(2) for debts claimed to be partially worthless, taxpayers have the burden of proving that, based on all the facts and circumstances, the portion of the debts with respect to which the deductions are claimed became unrecoverable by the end of the year for which the deductions are claimed. Austin Co. v. Commissioner, supra at 971; Portland Manufacturing Co. v. Commissioner, 56 T.C. 58, 73 (1971), affd. without published opinion 35 AFTR 2d 75-1439, 75-1 USTC par. 9449 (9th Cir. 1975). 3 The parties treat and brief the issue as to the allowability of petitioners’ claimed bad debt deductions relating to the automobile loans under the bad debt provisions of sec. 166. No claim is made that the claimed deductions should be allowed under the loss provisions of sec. 165.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011