- 26 - dispositive effect has been pointed out by this court * * *. As was made clear * * *, the taxpayer’s failure to overcome the presumptive correctness of deficiencies in reported income even over a period of consecutive years does not of itself create a presumption of fraud." Hawkins v. Commissioner, 234 F.2d 359, 360 (6th Cir. 1956), affg. in part, revg. in part, and remanding T.C. Memo. 1955-110. Respondent asserts that the fraud penalty is properly imposed on petitioner based upon circumstantial evidence in the form of several generally accepted indices, or "badges", of fraud. Respondent first urges that the asserted understatements of income of $152,495 in 1993 and $139,540 in 1995 justify an inference of fraud.10 Although systematic understatements of income over an extended time can be persuasive evidence of fraud, see, e.g., Solomon v. Commissioner, 732 F.2d 1459, 1461 (6th Cir. 1984), affg. T.C. Memo. 1982-603, such understatements may also be consistent with negligence or a even a mistaken view of the law. See Carr v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1978-408. Respondent urges that petitioner’s bookkeeping practices are evidence of fraudulent intent. We strongly suspect that petitioner’s hybrid-pooling method of tracking income falls short of generally accepted accounting principles. Petitioner, 10 According to respondent’s analysis, petitioners actually overstated their 1994 income-–a circumstance inconsistent with fraud.Page: Previous 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011