- 30 - adequate books and records or to substantiate items properly. See sec. 1.6662-3(b)(1), Income Tax Regs. Petitioners bear the burden of proving that respondent's determinations of these accuracy-related penalties are erroneous. See Rule 142(a); ASAT, Inc. v. Commissioner, 108 T.C. 147, 175 (1997).11 Taxpayers are not liable for accuracy-related penalties if they show that they had reasonable cause for the underpayment and that they acted in good faith. See sec. 6664(c). Petitioners failed to maintain adequate records to substantiate the deductions claimed on their tax returns for the years in issue. See sec. 6001; sec. 1.6001-1(a), Income Tax Regs. Petitioners’ records were substandard and, when presented to the Court, chaotic. Petitioners’ claims that they accurately reported their income for the years in issue are not aided by their submitting obviously indecipherable records into evidence. Petitioners blame respondent’s agents for the jumbled nature of the records, but they must also concede that they, or Jack, or their representatives, had some hand in presenting the records as they now exist. Having examined the records closely, we believe 11 Sec. 7491(c) places the burden of production on the Commissioner with respect to the liability of any individual for any penalty, addition to tax, or additional amount, in court proceedings arising in connection with examinations commencing after July 22, 1998. The petition in the instant case was filed in 1996. Accordingly, sec. 7491(c) is inapplicable.Page: Previous 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011