Glen A. Blair - Page 3




                                        - 3 -                                         
          of law.  Accordingly, we shall grant respondent’s motion for                
          summary judgment.                                                           
          Background                                                                  
               On or about April 27, 1998, Glen A. Blair (petitioner) and             
          his wife, Kay Blair, submitted to respondent a joint Form 1040A,            
          U.S. Individual Income Tax Return, for 1997.  Petitioner entered            
          zeros on every line of the income sections of the Form 1040A,               
          reported no tax due, and claimed a refund in the amount of                  
          $5,158.39 equal to the amount of Federal income tax withheld from           
          his wages.  A Form W-2, Wage and Tax Statement, attached to the             
          Form 1040A indicates that Union Oil Company of California paid              
          petitioner wages in the amount of $45,183.73 during 1997.                   
               On June 16, 2000, respondent issued a notice of deficiency             
          to petitioner determining a deficiency of $8,263 in his Federal             
          income tax for 1997 and an accuracy-related penalty under section           
          6662(a) in the amount of $620.32.  The deficiency was based on              
          respondent’s determination that petitioner failed to report the             
          wage income reported to respondent by Union Oil Co.                         
               On July 4, 2000, petitioner wrote a letter to the Director             
          of respondent’s Service Center in Ogden, Utah, acknowledging                
          receipt of the notice of deficiency for 1997, but challenging the           
          Director’s authority to issue such notices.  Although petitioner            
          knew that he had the right to contest respondent’s deficiency               








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011