Glen A. Blair - Page 6




                                        - 6 -                                         
          under section 6330(c)(1) and demonstrates that petitioner was               
          issued a notice and demand for payment.                                     
               Petitioner filed an objection to respondent’s motion                   
          repeating the various challenges first raised in his request for            
          an administrative hearing.  Thereafter, pursuant to notice,                 
          respondent’s motion was called for hearing at the Court's motions           
          session in Washington, D.C.                                                 
          Discussion                                                                  
               Section 6331(a) provides that if any person liable to pay              
          any tax neglects or refuses to pay such tax within 10 days after            
          notice and demand for payment, the Secretary is authorized to               
          collect such tax by levy on the person’s property.  Section                 
          6331(d) provides that at least 30 days before enforcing                     
          collection by levy on the person’s property the Secretary is                
          obliged to provide the person with a final notice of intent to              
          levy, including notice of the administrative appeals available to           
          the person.                                                                 
               Section 6330 generally provides that the Commissioner cannot           
          proceed with collection by levy until the person has been given             
          notice and the opportunity for an administrative review of the              
          matter (in the form of an Appeals Office hearing) and, if                   
          dissatisfied, with judicial review of the administrative                    
          determination.  See Davis v. Commissioner, 115 T.C. 35, 37                  
          (2000); Goza v. Commissioner, 114 T.C. 176, 179 (2000).                     






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011