- 17 - deduction may be allowed to the extent that the item is allocable to a portion of the home which is exclusively used on a regular basis as the principal place of business for the taxpayer’s trade or business. Sec. 280A(c)(1)(A). Petitioners argue that 43 percent of their residence was used exclusively for business purposes; we find that 12.7 percent of the residence was so used. We reject petitioners’ argument that portions of the middle and bottom floors and the garage were used exclusively for business: Certain areas purportedly were set up for use by Ms. Brayshaw, who was not engaged in her medical business in the year in issue. Other areas contained inherently personal items, such as a fireplace and sofas, or were for storage which was not necessarily related to Mr. Brayshaw’s businesses. Finally, we have found that the Jeep was not used exclusively for business purposes; consequently, the garage in which it was stored likewise was not so used. On the other hand, we accept Mr. Brayshaw’s testimony–corroborated by photographs-- that portions of the top floor were used exclusively as his principal place of business with respect to his several businesses. We therefore find that 228.75 square feet, of the total 1,804.32 square feet, were used exclusively and regularly as Mr. Brayshaw’s principal place of business. Petitioners are entitled to deductions for the applicable percentage of the following substantiated expenses which were paid by petitioners:Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011