Michael T. Caracci and Cindy W. Caracci, et al. - Page 2




                                        - 2 -                                         
                    Members of the C family wholly own three home                     
               health care organizations (P1, P2, and P3) exempt from                 
               Federal income taxes under sec. 501(c)(3), I.R.C.  In                  
               1995, the C family created three S corporations (S1,                   
               S2, and S3) and collectively received all of the                       
               resulting stock.  P1, P2, and P3 then transferred all                  
               of their assets to S1, S2, and S3, respectively, in                    
               exchange for each transferee’s assumption of the                       
               transferor’s liabilities.  R determined that the fair                  
               market value of the transferred assets substantially                   
               exceeded the consideration received in exchange.                       
               Accordingly, R determined S1, S2, S3, and members of                   
               the C family were liable for excise taxes under sec.                   
               4958, I.R.C., and members of the C family who received                 
               stock in S1, S2, or S3 but did not have an ownership                   
               interest in P1, P2, and P3 were liable for income taxes                
               on the value of the stock received.  R also revoked the                
               tax exemptions of P1, P2, and P3.  Held:  The                          
               transferred assets’ value at the time of transfer                      
               decided.  Held, further, the value of the transferred                  
               assets exceeded the value of the consideration                         
               received; thus, S1, S2, S3, and members of the C family                
               are “disqualified persons” subject to excise taxes                     
               under sec. 4958, I.R.C., as beneficiaries of “excess                   
               benefit transactions”.  Held, further, although P1, P2,                
               and P3 engaged in “excess benefit transactions”, a                     
               revocation of their tax-exempt status is inappropriate                 
               given the “intermediate sanctions” under sec. 4958,                    
               I.R.C.  Held, further, the three members of the C                      
               family are not liable for the income taxes determined                  
               by R.                                                                  


               David D. Aughtry and Vivian D. Hoard, for petitioners.                 
               Robin W. Denick and Mark A. Ericson, for respondent.                   


               LARO, Judge:  These cases are before the Court consolidated.           
          Petitioners seek review of respondent’s determinations for 1995             
          of income tax deficiencies, excise tax deficiencies under section           
          4958, accuracy-related penalties under section 6662(a), and                 






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011