June Cordes, et al. - Page 30




                                       - 30 -                                         
               A constructive dividend is paid when a corporation confers             
          an economic benefit on a shareholder without expectation of                 
          repayment.  Wortham Mach. Co. v. United States, 521 F.2d 160, 164           
          (10th Cir. 1975).  Petitioners do not dispute that the payments             
          in question were made without expectation of repayment; they                
          focus instead on whether CFC conferred an economic benefit on               
          Mrs. Cordes as a shareholder of CFC.  Because only shareholders             
          may receive constructive dividends for Federal income tax                   
          purposes and because we do not believe Mrs. Cordes was a                    
          shareholder of CFC for Federal income tax purposes, we conclude             
          she did not receive constructive dividends from CFC during the              
          years at issue.                                                             
               Mrs. Cordes held legal title to at least 33.4 percent of the           
          outstanding shares of stock in CFC throughout the taxable years             
          at issue.  The Cordeses’ children held legal title to the balance           
          of the shares.  See Appendix A, Schedule of Stock Transfers, and            
          notes therein.  Regardless of Mrs. Cordes’s percentage of record            
          ownership, however, “record ownership of stock, standing alone,             
          is not determinative of who is required to include any dividends            
          attributable to such stock in gross income.  Rather, beneficial             
          ownership is the controlling factor.”  Cordes v. Commissioner,              
          T.C. Memo. 1994-377 (citing Walker v. Commissioner, 544 F.2d 419            
          (9th Cir. 1976), revg. T.C. Memo. 1972-223; Ragghianti v.                   
          Commissioner, 71 T.C. 346, 349 (1978), affd. without published              






Page:  Previous  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011