June Cordes, et al. - Page 48




                                       - 48 -                                         
                         presented no argument regarding the penalty.  We             
                         deem petitioner to have conceded the application             
                         of the penalty.                                              
          II. Docket No. 3284-96, Cordes Finance Corporation:                         
               A.   1992:                                                             
                    1.   Respondent adjusted petitioner’s income for 1992             
                         to reflect additional gross receipts of                      
                         $1,174,666.                                                  
                         a.    Petitioner concedes this adjustment, to the            
                               extent of $311,928.                                    
                         b.    Respondent concedes this adjustment, to the            
                               extent of $20,000.                                     
                         c.    The remaining $842,738 at issue reflects               
                               gross receipts that respondent determined              
                               were income to petitioner for 1992 because             
                               respondent determined petitioner used an               
                               incorrect method of accounting for its 1992            
                               taxable year and readjusted petitioner’s               
                               income to reflect income accrued under the             
                               accrual method of accounting.  The parties             
                               stipulated that the final decision in                  
                               Cordes Fin. Corp. v. Commissioner, supra,              
                               would decide the proper amount of                      
                               petitioner’s gross receipts for 1992.  In              
                               accordance with the parties’ stipulations,             
                               respondent concedes this adjustment.                   
                    2.   Respondent readjusted petitioner’s reported bad              
                         debt deduction for 1992 by $537,599 to reflect               
                         substantiated bad debts for the taxable year.                
                         Respondent concedes this adjustment.                         
                    3.   Respondent disallowed $112,756 of petitioner’s               
                         reported interest expense deduction for 1992 to              
                         reflect substantiated interest expenses for the              
                         taxable year.  Petitioner concedes that                      
                         adjustment, to the extent of $73,298.                        
                         a.    As a mathematical computation, petitioner’s            
                               concession leaves $39,458 of the interest              
                               expense at issue for 1992.  The parties                
                               stipulated, however, that $52,870 is                   
                               properly at issue.                                     
                         b.    Respondent concedes that portion of the                
                               $52,870 paid which constitutes a safe-haven            
                               rate of interest calculated, pursuant to               
                               sec. 482 and the regulations thereunder, on            
                               the underlying loans, to the extent that               
                               portion exceeds the amount paid on those               
                               underlying loans already allowed as an                 
                               interest expense on the underlying loans               





Page:  Previous  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  51  52  53  54  55  56  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011