Michael Craig v. Commissioner - Page 11




                                        -11-                                          
          under sections 6502, 6531, or 6532 are suspended for the same               
          period.  Sec. 6330(e)(1).                                                   
               Whereas the above-stated rules for a Hearing are provided              
          explicitly in the statute, the rules for an equivalent hearing              
          have their genesis in the statute’s legislative history and the             
          regulations implementing Congressional intent as gleaned from               
          that history.  See H. Conf. Rept. 105-599, at 266 (1998); 1998-3            
          C.B. 1020 (in the event that a taxpayer does not timely request a           
          Hearing, “The Secretary must provide a hearing equivalent to the            
          hearing if later requested by the taxpayer”); cf. Johnson v.                
          Commissioner, 86 AFTR 2d 2000-5225, 2000-2 USTC par. 50,591 (D.             
          Or. 2000) (“‘equivalent hearing’ is provided for only by                    
          regulation and is not mandated by Section 6330 itself”).  The               
          scheme of the regulations as they apply to equivalent hearings              
          generally follows the statutory scheme for Hearings.                        
               Under the regulations, any taxpayer who fails to timely                
          request a Hearing may receive an equivalent hearing.  Sec.                  
          301.6330-1(i)(1), Proced. & Admin. Regs.  The equivalent hearing            
          (like the Hearing) is held with Appeals, and the Appeals officer            
          considers the same issues which he or she would have considered             
          had the equivalent hearing been a Hearing.  Id.  The Appeals                
          officer also generally follows the same procedures at an                    
          equivalent hearing which he or she would have followed had the              
          equivalent hearing been a Hearing.  Id.  Although the Appeals               






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011