Michael Craig v. Commissioner - Page 14




                                        -14-                                          
          inferences are drawn in a manner most favorable to the party                
          opposing summary judgment.  Dahlstrom v. Commissioner, 85 T.C.              
          812, 821 (1985); Jacklin v. Commissioner, 79 T.C. 340, 344                  
          (1982).                                                                     
               Petitioner has raised no genuine issue as to any material              
          fact.  Accordingly, we conclude that this case is ripe for                  
          summary judgment.                                                           
               Section 6331(a) provides that if any person liable to pay              
          any tax neglects or refuses to pay such tax within 10 days after            
          notice and demand for payment, the Secretary may collect such tax           
          by levy on the person’s property.  Section 6331(d) provides that            
          at least 30 days before enforcing collection by levy on the                 
          person’s property, the Secretary must provide the person with a             
          final notice of intent to levy, including notice of the                     
          administrative appeals available to the person.                             
               Section 6330 generally provides that the Commissioner cannot           
          proceed with collection by levy until the person has been                   
          provided with notice and the opportunity for an administrative              
          review of the matter (in the form of a Hearing before Appeals)              
          and, if dissatisfied, with judicial review of the administrative            
          determination.  Davis v. Commissioner, 115 T.C. 35, 37 (2000);              
          Goza v. Commissioner, 114 T.C. at 179.  In the event of such a              
          judicial review, the Court’s standard of review depends on                  
          whether the underlying tax liability is at issue.  The Court                






Page:  Previous  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011