Eddie Cordes, Inc., et al. - Page 25




                                       - 25 -                                         
          John Cordes in 1994 and 1995, respectively; the distributions of            
          $90,000 and $120,000 to Jean Ann Richard in 1994 and 1995,                  
          respectively; and the distributions of $180,000 and $100,000 to             
          Mrs. Cordes in 1995 from John Cordes’s and Jean Ann Richard’s               
          accounts, respectively, do not constitute additional constructive           
          dividends from CFC to Mr. Cordes.18                                         
                    2.   Cash Distributions to Mrs. Cordes                            
               CFC issued checks totaling $484,651 in 1994 and totaling               
          $120,000 in 1995 made payable to Mrs. Cordes.  All of the checks            
          were deposited in Mrs. Cordes’s personal checking account.                  
          Respondent determined that all of these distributions constituted           
          constructive dividends to CFC’s shareholder(s).  Petitioners                
          maintain that the distributions are not constructive dividends to           
          CFC’s shareholder(s) because the shareholder(s) did not                     
          authorize, receive, or derive economic benefits from the                    
          distributions or, alternatively, that the distributions                     
          represented loans or the repayment of loans to the                          
          shareholder(s).                                                             
               Respondent also determined that the $180,000 and $100,000              
          distributions Mrs. Cordes received and deposited in 1995 and                
          which were charged to John Cordes’s and Jean Ann Richard’s loan             
          accounts, respectively, were constructive dividends to CFC’s                
          shareholder(s).  We addressed those distributions above.  Below,            


               18Respondent has not alleged that these distributions are              
          taxable to any of the petitioners on any other grounds nor has              
          respondent alleged that the distributions are gifts from Mr.                
          Cordes to the respective recipients.                                        




Page:  Previous  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011