Linda A. Fields - Page 18




                                       - 18 -                                         
          III.  Amount of Recoverable Costs                                           
               A.  The “Special Factor” Issue                                         
               Section 7430(c)(1)(B)(iii) provides that attorney’s fees               
          recoverable under section 7430 shall not exceed $125 per hour               
          (adjusted annually for inflation) “unless the court determines              
          that a special factor, such as the limited availability of                  
          qualified attorneys for such proceeding, the difficulty of the              
          issues presented in the case, or the local availability of tax              
          expertise, justifies a higher rate.”  Petitioner argues that the            
          circumstances of this case warrant the determination of                     
          recoverable costs without regard to the statutory rate cap.9                
          Specifically, petitioner argues that respondent’s disparate                 
          treatment of petitioner and her ex-husband with regard to the               
          fraud penalty, as evidenced by the Appeals officer’s June 2,                
          1999, settlement offer, should qualify as a “special factor” in             
          that such action necessitated the retention of separate counsel,            
          effectively precluding her from sharing the cost of her defense             
          with her ex-husband.                                                        
               In Estate of Cervin v. Commissioner, 200 F.3d 351, 355-358             
          (5th Cir. 2000), affg. T.C. Memo. 1998-176, the Court of Appeals            
          for the Fifth Circuit rejected the taxpayer’s contention that the           

               9  Petitioner raised the “special factor” argument for the             
          first time in her reply to respondent’s objection to the motion.            
          Because we reject the substance of petitioner’s argument, we do             
          not address the procedural ramifications, if any, of petitioner’s           
          failure to raise the “special factor” issue in the motion.                  





Page:  Previous  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011