- 19 - finding of a special factor for purposes of section 7430 could be based on the alleged misconduct of the Commissioner. The Court agreed with the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit that, in a case in which an award of costs is warranted under section 7430, “the Commissioner’s conduct has already been taken into account”. Id. at 357 (quoting Cassuto v. Commissioner, 936 F.2d 736, 744 (2d Cir. 1991), affg. in part and revg. in part 93 T.C. 256 (1989)). We agree with both courts that the finding of a special factor based on the alleged misconduct of the Commissioner would amount to an award of punitive damages, contrary to the purposes of section 7430. Estate of Cervin v. Commissioner, supra at 357; Cassuto v. Commissioner, supra at 744.10 We therefore reject petitioner’s contention that we should treat respondent’s conduct in this case as a special factor for purposes of section 7430. B. Adjustments to Claimed Costs 1. Attorney’s Fees Relating to Underlying Dispute Respondent argues, and we agree, that petitioner is not entitled to recover fees that are attributable to issues other 10 The version of sec. 7430 at issue in Estate of Cervin and Cassuto listed only “the limited availability of qualified attorneys” as an example of a special factor. The subsequent addition of “the difficulty of the issues presented in the case” and “the local availability of tax expertise” as special factor examples reinforces the conclusion of the courts in those cases that the Commissioner’s conduct is not the type of circumstance that can qualify as a special factor under sec. 7430.Page: Previous 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011