- 6 - with the parent who, as between both parents, has the physical custody of the child for the greater portion of the calendar year.” Since petitioner and Ms. Floyd lived apart during all of 1998, the issue under section 152(e)(1)(B) is whether Donnell II was in the custody of petitioner for more than one-half of the calendar year. On this record, the evidence fails to establish this fact. Petitioner did not have physical custody of his son for a greater portion of the year than did Ms. Floyd, the child’s mother. While petitioner and Ms. Floyd had worked out an equitable arrangement whereby the children spent several days each week with petitioner, that time did not exceed one-half of the calendar year in total. Even if, as petitioner contends, both children spent every Sunday through Wednesday with him, the children in fact spent part of Sunday and part of Wednesday with their mother, as well as all of Thursday through Saturday with her. On the basis of the testimony and the record, the Court holds that the twins spent more than half of their time in the custody and care of their mother during 1998. Because Ms. Floyd was the custodial parent of the twins in 1998, Donnell II is treated as having received over half of his support from Ms. Floyd during that year. Sec. 152(e)(1). This result provides consistent treatment for the children, who werePage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011