Framatome Connectors USA, Inc. - Page 12




                                       - 12 -                                         
          (1) Change authorized or issued capital; (2) change or conclude             
          any license agreements; (3) acquire an interest in or sell shares           
          in other companies; (4) pay dividends; (5) transfer all or a                
          major part of the business; and (6) entrust management to a third           
          party (the “six veto powers”).                                              
               g.  The parties shall fully discuss “Any other important               
          actions in Burndy-Japan for an amicable solution.”                          
               h.  Furukawa and Sumitomo shall continue to sell and promote           
          Burndy-Japan products aggressively.  Burndy-US shall inform                 
          Furukawa and Sumitomo about new products that Burndy-US                     
          introduces.                                                                 
               i.  The agreement shall be construed under Japanese law.               
               j.  Disputes in connection with this agreement shall be                
          settled by arbitration.                                                     
               k.  The document is the entire agreement of the parties and            
          supersedes all previous agreements “in respect to the subject               
          matter hereof”.                                                             
               Burndy-US did not pay a control premium when it acquired               
          shares of Burndy-Japan from Furukawa and Sumitomo in 1973.4                 
               4.   Burndy-Japan’s Presidents and Board of Directors                  
               Kaiji Kambe (Kambe) began to work for Burndy-Japan in 1967.            
          Kambe was an employee of Furukawa until 1972.  He became an                 


               4  We discuss petitioners’ contention to the contrary below            
          pp. 41-44.                                                                  





Page:  Previous  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011