Lee G. Gale - Page 39




                                       - 39 -                                         
               Petitioner therefore received taxable income in the amounts            
          of $255,500 in 199317 and $5,391.94 in 1994, for distributions              
          from the trust account to him (or for his benefit).                         
          NOL Issues                                                                  
               Section 172(a) allows as a deduction for a taxable year the            
          aggregate of NOL carryovers and carrybacks to that year.  For the           
          years before the Court, an NOL must be carried back to each of              
          the 3 years preceding the taxable year of loss and carried over             
          to each of the 15 years following the year of such loss.  Sec.              
          172(b)(1)(A).  The entire amount of the NOL must first be carried           
          to the earliest eligible carryback year.  Thereafter, the excess            
          (if any) of the NOL over the taxable income for each of the prior           
          taxable years to which such loss was carried must be carried to             
          each of the succeeding years.  Sec. 172(b)(2); sec. 1.172-4(a)(3)           
          and (b), Income Tax Regs.  A taxpayer may, however, elect to                
          relinquish the carryback period.  The election must be made, in a           
          prescribed manner, by the due date (including extensions) for               
          filing the taxpayer’s return for the NOL year in which the                  
          election is to be in effect.  Sec. 172(b)(3).                               
               Petitioner reported an NOL carryover of $148,367 on his 1992           
          individual return.  The carryover consisted of losses carried               
          forward from 1990 and 1991.  Petitioner combined the NOL                    


               17Consisting of the $250,000 paid to petitioner and $5,500             
          paid to Max Binswenger on petitioner’s behalf.                              





Page:  Previous  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011