Paul A. and Marilyn J. Grothues - Page 18




                                       - 18 -                                         
          the tax disadvantages.  Higgins v. Smith, 308 U.S. 473, 477                 
          (1940); see also Moline Props., Inc. v. Commissioner, supra.  A             
          corporation and its stockholders are separate entities, and the             
          title to corporate property is vested in the corporation and not            
          in the owners of the corporate stock.  Sun Towers, Inc. v.                  
          Heckler, 725 F.2d. 315, 331 (5th Cir. 1984) (citing Moline                  
          Props., Inc. v. Commissioner, supra). Petitioners have made no              
          claim in this proceeding that the separate legal status of their            
          corporations should be disregarded.                                         
               In Vaughan v. Commissioner, 17 B.T.A. 620 (1929), the Board            
          of Tax Appeals refused to disregard the separate entity and                 
          disallowed a corporate loss claimed by a stockholder on his own             
          return.  The assistant cashier of a bank embezzled large amounts            
          from the bank.  In order to keep the bank open, the taxpayer,               
          president of the bank and a large stockholder, had to give the              
          bank securities worth $63,336 within 24 hours.  The Board held              
          the taxpayer could not deduct the contribution of $63,336 as a              
          loss, since the bank had suffered the loss, and the bank’s loss             
          was not the stockholder’s loss.                                             
               Petitioners’ corporations are entities separate from                   
          petitioners and their sole proprietorship, SWAS.8  The separate             

               8With respect to entities solely owned by husband and wife             
          as community property under the laws of a State, the IRS will               
          respect a taxpayer’s treatment of the entity as either a                    
          partnership or a disregarded entity.  Rev. Proc. 2002-69, 2002-45           
                                                             (continued...)           





Page:  Previous  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011