Christine M. Hackl - Page 12




                                       - 12 -                                         
          and F & W Forestry Services, Inc., were retained by Treeco to               
          provide consulting and management services for the tree farms.              
          Contained in the record are a Five-Year Timber Operating Budget             
          for the McIntosh County Farm, prepared by F & W Forestry                    
          Services, and detailed forest management plans for the Putnam and           
          Flager County Farms, prepared by Georgia Pacific.  These                    
          documents discuss, among other things, plantation thinning,                 
          reforestation, fertilization, and capital improvements.  The F &            
          W Forestry Services budget projects losses through 2000 but                 
          characterizes the McIntosh tract as having “great future income             
          potential”.  The Georgia Pacific plan describing the Putnam                 
          property similarly states:  “These recommendations, if followed,            
          will provide you with a healthy, fast growing forest which will             
          lead to a steady stream of income in the future.”  A.J. Hackl               
          meets on a regular basis with consultants from Georgia Pacific              
          and F & W Forestry Services regarding maintenance of the tree               
          farms.  The parties have stipulated that he has always managed              
          Treeco and its successors with such care as an ordinarily prudent           
          person in a like position would use under similar circumstances.            
               The primary business purpose of all three of the above                 
          entities has been to acquire and manage plantation pine forests             
          for long-term income and appreciation for petitioners and their             
          heirs and not to produce immediate income.  Petitioners                     
          anticipated that all three entities would operate at a loss for a           






Page:  Previous  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011