Robert Hurford and Catherine Simone Hale - Page 4




                                        - 4 -                                         
          redetermination with the Court contesting the notice of                     
          deficiency.                                                                 
          On July 23, 2000, respondent mailed to petitioners a Final                  
          Notice of Intent to Levy and Notice of Your Right to a Hearing              
          that stated petitioners owed taxes and statutory additions for              
          1996 totaling $37,614.14 and that respondent was preparing to               
          collect the amount due by levy.  On August 16, 2000, petitioners            
          filed with respondent a Request for a Collection Due Process                
          Hearing that included a request that respondent provide                     
          petitioners with a summary record of assessment, and                        
          verification that all applicable laws and administrative                    
          procedures were met with regard to the assessment and proposed              
          collection for 1996.                                                        
               On July 10, 2001, Appeals Officer Eugene Chu conducted an              
          administrative hearing in petitioners’ case by way of a                     
          telephone conference call with petitioner Robert Hale and his               
          representative, Brian Malatesta.  Prior to the hearing, Appeals             
          Officer Chu provided petitioners with a Form 4340, Certificate              
          of Assessments, Payments, and Other Specified Matters, which                
          showed that, for 1996, respondent entered assessments against               
          petitioners for:  (1) The amounts determined to be due in the               
          notice of deficiency dated May 19, 1998; and (2) statutory                  
          interest.  During the hearing, Mr. Malatesta challenged the                 
          assessments entered against petitioners on the ground that a                






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011