- 31 -
the Kodak stock, from petitioner’s personal P-B No. 1 account
into ANB No. 1.
Notwithstanding the granting of the TRO, Northwest remained
frustrated in its efforts to obtain information from petitioner
regarding bank and brokerage accounts into which ticket sales
proceeds had been transferred. On July 1, 1988, Hasman wrote
Belofsky advising him of petitioner’s refusal to provide
financial documents and Hasman’s opinion that such conduct
violated the TRO, and urging Belofsky to counsel petitioner on
the need to comply with the TRO so as to “resolve the growing
need for court supervision of your client’s conduct”. More
specifically, Hasman wrote:
I was advised yesterday that our [Northwest’s]
auditors’ review of the sparse documents which Mr. Han
and Mr. Chung have made available disclosed six
brokerage accounts, about which Northwest had no prior
knowledge because of Mr. Han’s prior refusal to
disclose those accounts, or documentation which would
lead to disclosure of those accounts. This appears to
be a pattern that your client has been following,
namely, withholding information and documentation which
would lead to the disclosure of relevant financial and
other information necessary to conduct the ongoing
audit. We believe that the withholding of
documentation which would lead to disclosure of
accounts in which Mr. Han and his companies have
transferred funds has been and continues to be
intentional and in violation of the requirement * * *
of the TRO, which requires the defendants to allow my
client “immediate access” to books, records and
documents.
Page: Previous 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 NextLast modified: May 25, 2011