- 4 - telephone, but he did not discuss it with anyone other than those who recommended the investment and those who were involved with it. The partnership was formed on December 20, 1982. At this time, petitioner had investments in stocks, bonds, mutual funds, real estate, and other partnership ventures. Petitioner received and read a private placement memorandum, dated April 1, 1982, relating to his investment in the partnership. Prefatory material in the memorandum contained the following caveats: PROSPECTIVE INVESTORS ARE CAUTIONED NOT TO CONSTRUE THIS MEMORANDUM OR ANY PRIOR OR SUBSEQUENT COMMUNICATIONS AS CONSTITUTING LEGAL OR TAX ADVICE. * * * INVESTORS ARE URGED TO CONSULT THEIR OWN COUNSEL AS TO ALL MATTERS CONCERNING THIS INVESTMENT. * * * * * * * NO REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND ARE INTENDED OR SHOULD BE INFERRED WITH RESPECT TO THE ECONOMIC RETURN OR TAX ADVANTAGES WHICH MAY ACCRUE TO THE INVESTORS IN THE UNITS. EACH PURCHASER OF UNITS HEREIN SHOULD AND IS EXPECTED TO CONSULT WITH HIS OWN TAX ADVISOR AS TO THE TAX ASPECTS. In a section entitled “Use of Proceeds”, an estimation of various expenditures, the memorandum stated that approximately 95 percent of the capital contributions from the partners would be allocated to the research and development contract (regardless of the total amount of the contributions). The only other expenses were to be organizational costs and commissions. One of the “risk factors” listed for the investment contained the following discussion:Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011