- 12 -
On January 16, 2002, Herbst Management Trust filed a re-
sponse to respondent’s motion to hold petitioner in default in
the case at docket No. 9999-00, and petitioner in each of the
cases at docket Nos. 10001-00 and 10002-00 filed a response to
respondent’s motion in each such case to dismiss for lack of
prosecution and to impose sanctions under section 6673. On
January 30, 2002, Herbst Charitable Trust filed a response to
respondent’s motion to hold petitioner in default in the case at
docket No. 10000-00. Each of those respective responses con-
tained arguments and contentions that the Court found in an Order
dated January 18, 2002, in the case at docket No. 9999-00, an
7(...continued)
quest as the original petition was issued in error
due to false directions given to petitioner by
respondent. Petitioner believes that he has the
right to correct his mistake and withdraw the
original petition.
2. This Court and the respondent recognize the peti-
tioner as a Trust and cease attempting to set
aside a contract in direct opposition to the Con-
stitution of the United States of America.
3. This court sanction the respondent for using this
Court for illegal purposes. Respondent has no
legal tax claim as petitioner has noted to respon-
dent and this Court on numerous occasions. With-
out a legal claim, respondent fraudulently in-
structed petitioner to use this Court to legiti-
mize his illegal attempt to deprive petitioner of
his assets.
4. This Court instruct the respondent to cease, now
and forever, harassment of petitioner.
Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 NextLast modified: May 25, 2011