Herbst Asset Mgmt. Trust, et al. - Page 14




                                       - 14 -                                         
          Orders) in the cases at docket Nos. 10001-00 and 10002-00 in                
          which it granted respondent’s respective motions to compel                  
          discovery and ordered petitioners to produce on or before Septem-           
          ber 28, 2001, the documents requested in respondent’s requests              
          for production of documents and the answers to respondent’s                 
          interrogatories.  In the respective September 19, 2001 Orders in            
          the cases at docket Nos. 10001-00 and 10002-00, the Court further           
          ordered respondent to file written reports in those respective              
          cases on or before October 9, 2001, informing the Court whether             
          petitioners in those cases had complied with the Court’s                    
          respective September 19, 2001 Orders.  The Court’s respective               
          September 19, 2001 Orders put petitioners on notice in the cases            
          at docket Nos. 10001-00 and 10002-00 that if they did                       
               not fully comply with the provisions of this Order,                    
               this Court will be inclined to impose sanctions pursu-                 
               ant to Tax Court Rule 104, which may include dismissal                 
               of this case and entry of a decision against peti-                     
               tioner.                                                                
               On September 14, 2001, respondent filed a motion to consoli-           
          date the instant cases for trial, briefing, and opinion, which              
          the Court granted on September 24, 2001.                                    
               On October 3, 2001, Mr. Herbst filed on behalf of petition-            
          ers in the instant cases a motion to continue the trial (peti-              
          tioners’ motion to continue) “until such time as the Petitioner             
          has time to answer the Respondent’s Motion to Compel Responses to           
          Respondent’s Interrogatories.”  In support of that motion,                  






Page:  Previous  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011