- 20 -
Although not ordered by the Court, on January 16, 2002,
Herbst Management Trust submitted, and the Court had filed, a
response to respondent’s motion to hold petitioner in default in
the case at docket No. 9999-00, and Ms. Herbst in the case at
docket No. 10001-00 and Mr. Herbst in the case at docket No.
10002-00 submitted, and the Court had filed, respective responses
5(...continued)
* * * * * * *
4. Petitioner does not want this false tax claim to
be litigated in court, and has petitioned this
Court to have this case removed from the docket as
having been petitioned in error due to the
erroneous instructions given by the respondent.
WHEREFORE it is prayed that:
1. This Court dismiss this case at petitioner’s
request as the original petition was issued in
error due to false directions given to petitioner
by respondent. Petitioner believes that he has
the right to correct his mistake and withdraw the
original petition.
2. This Court and the respondent recognize the
petitioner as a Trust and cease attempting to set
aside a contract in direct opposition to the
Constitution of the United States of America.
3. This court sanction the respondent for using this
Court for illegal purposes. Respondent has no
legal tax claim as petitioner has noted to
respondent and this Court on numerous occasions.
Without a legal claim, respondent fraudulently
instructed petitioner to use this Court to
legitimize his illegal attempt to deprive
petitioner of his assets.
4. This Court instruct the respondent to cease, now
and forever, harassment of petitioner.
Page: Previous 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 NextLast modified: May 25, 2011