Thomas R. Hochschild, Sr. - Page 7




                                        - 7 -                                         
          that applicable legal requirements and/or administrative                    
          procedure have been met.  Section 6330(c)(2)(A) details issues              
          that may be raised by a taxpayer at the hearing.  The taxpayer              
          may raise “any relevant issue relating to the unpaid tax or the             
          proposed levy” including spousal defenses, challenges to the                
          appropriateness of collection action, and alternatives to                   
          collection.  Sec. 6330(c)(2)(A).  Issues relating to the                    
          underlying tax liability may not be raised if the taxpayer has              
          received a notice of deficiency or the taxpayer otherwise had an            
          opportunity to dispute the tax liability.  See sec.                         
          6330(c)(2)(B).                                                              
               Petitioner, in his petition to this Court, alleged that,               
          during 1999, he was notified that he owed income tax and, to                
          date, he was not able to find out any factual information, even             
          though he had filed a request under the FOIA.  Petitioner alleged           
          that the “errors by the I.R.S. is that there are no Factual                 
          evidence in the claim against me, No persons name has come up               
          that I can find out how the claim came to be and for all                    
          practical purpose[s] it seems that the figures used were made up            
          out of thin air.”  Petitioner also made an allegation about his             
          disabled condition and status as a disabled veteran.                        
               In subsequent documents filed with the Court, the gist of              
          petitioner’s contentions concerned his status as a disabled                 
          veteran and his anger and fears connected with his legal                    






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011