John Thurman and Elaine Sheryl Horejs - Page 13




                                       - 13 -                                         
          assessment.  Sec. 6203.  “The summary record, through supporting            
          records, shall provide identification of the taxpayer, the                  
          character of the liability assessed, the taxable period, if                 
          applicable, and the amount of the assessment.”  Sec. 301.6203-1,            
          Proced. & Admin. Regs.                                                      
               Section 6330(c)(1) does not require the Commissioner to rely           
          on a particular document to satisfy the verification requirement            
          imposed therein.  Roberts v. Commissioner, 118 T.C. 365, 371 n.10           
          (2002); Weishan v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2002-88; Lindsey v.             
          Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2002-87; Tolotti v. Commissioner, T.C.             
          Memo. 2002-86; Duffield v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2002-53;                
          Kuglin v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2002-51.  In this regard, we             
          observe that the Forms 4340 on which the Appeals officer relied             
          contained all the information prescribed in section 301.6203-1,             
          Proced. & Admin. Regs.  See Weishan v. Commissioner, supra;                 
          Lindsey v. Commissioner, supra; Tolotti v. Commissioner, supra;             
          Duffield v. Commissioner, supra; Kuglin v. Commissioner, supra.             
              Petitioners have not alleged any irregularity in the                   
          assessment procedure that would raise a question about the                  
          validity of the assessments or the information contained in the             
          Forms 4340.  See Davis v. Commissioner, 115 T.C. 35, 41 (2000);             
          Mann v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2002-48.  Accordingly, we hold             
          that the Appeals officer satisfied the verification requirement             








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011