- 26 - 3. Fraudulent Intent For purposes of section 6653(b), fraud is the intentional commission of an act to evade a tax believed to be owing. Webb v. Commissioner, 394 F.2d 366, 377 (5th Cir. 1968), affg. T.C. Memo. 1966-81. Fraud is never presumed; it must be established by affirmative evidence. Beaver v. Commissioner, 55 T.C. 85, 92 (1970). To establish that petitioner is liable for the fraud penalty for 1987 and 1988, respondent must show by clear and convincing evidence that petitioner knew he was taxable in each of those years on at least some of the funds that he caused NSA to divert from TCM to Camaro and some of the funds he diverted from TCM to Double D or to his personal account. To establish that TCM is liable for the fraud penalty for 1987, respondent must show by clear and convincing evidence that petitioner, as president and CEO of TCM, also knew TCM was liable for tax on at least some of the funds he caused NSA to divert from TCM to Camaro and some of the funds he diverted from TCM to Double D or to his personal account. The Commissioner may prove fraud by circumstantial evidence because direct evidence of the taxpayer's intent is rarely available. Stephenson v. Commissioner, 79 T.C. 995, 1005-1006 (1982), affd. 748 F.2d 331 (6th Cir. 1984).Page: Previous 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011